Corporate Regulations - Revision history

Izac112: /* Additional */

2020-09-06T18:22:34Z

Additional

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 6 September 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	The Colony Director is not above Corporate Regulations, and can be arrested by Security for breaking it. The only time that the Corporate Regulations can be overridden is when there is an imminent and overwhelming threat to the station, such as during Code Delta evacuations.		The Colony Director is not above Corporate Regulations, and can be arrested by Security for breaking it. The only time that the Corporate Regulations can be overridden is when there is an imminent and overwhelming threat to the station, such as during Code Delta evacuations.

	Pardons are only legitimate if they come from a NanoTrasen higher-up (that is, someone who ranks above the Colony Director). Despite his high ranking, the Colony Director cannot spit in the face of Corporate Regulations, and any attempts to do so are infractions.		<s>Pardons are only legitimate if they come from a NanoTrasen higher-up (that is, someone who ranks above the Colony Director). Despite his high ranking, the Colony Director cannot spit in the face of Corporate Regulations, and any attempts to do so are infractions.</s>

	If you can't find the incident listed in here you can set up a tribunal. See Legal Standard Operating Procedure.		If you can't find the incident listed in here you can set up a tribunal. See Legal Standard Operating Procedure.

Izac112: /* Low Level Infractions */ |'''Harassment''' |§128

2020-09-05T21:28:43Z

Low Level Infractions: |'''Harassment''' |§128

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 5 September 2020
Line 297:		Line 297:
	\| Up to 5 minutes. Demotion or Dismissal.		\| Up to 5 minutes. Demotion or Dismissal.
	\| 150 credits.		\| 150 credits.
			\|-
			\|§128
			\|'''Harassment'''
			\|To persistently insult, stalk, ridicule, or otherwise intentionally bring stress upon another crew member.
			\|If a crew member has been following you around or bad mouthing you for some time, and has already been asked to stop, Security may be involved to ''make'' it stop, starting with an official (last) warning. If the actions or comments are of a sexual context, do not use this charge and use '''Sexual Harassment (§110)''' instead. If harassing comments are proven false, add '''Slander (§111)''' to the charges. However, Security should take care to avoid punishing ''constructive'' criticism if possible. For example, just calling someone incompetent over and over is viewed as harassment. Explaining how to fix something it is not harassment unless it comes from a source who doesn't have any qualification for saying so (e.g. a janitor bothering an engineer about the best way to power the station). If a crew member believes somebody is doing their job poorly and it is affecting them, they should bring it up with the relevant head of staff, or an [[Internal Affairs Agent]].
			\|Warning.
			\|5 minutes. Forced psychiatric examination.
			\|100 Thalers (after warning).
			\|-
	\|}		\|}

Izac112 at 21:48, 26 May 2020

2020-05-26T21:48:52Z

Show changes

Izac112: /* Interpretation of the Law */

2020-02-18T02:50:55Z

Interpretation of the Law

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:50, 18 February 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	For certain crimes, the accused party's intent is important. The difference between 'assault' and 'attempted murder' can be very hard to ascertain. It is important to note though, that 'assault' and 'attempted murder' are mutually exclusive. You cannot be charged with 'assault' and 'attempted murder' from the same crime as the intent of each is different. Likewise, 'assault with a deadly weapon' and 'assaulting an officer' are also crimes that exclude others. Pay careful attention to the requirements of each law and select the one that best fits the crime when deciding sentence.		For certain crimes, the accused party's intent is important. The difference between 'assault' and 'attempted murder' can be very hard to ascertain. It is important to note though, that 'assault' and 'attempted murder' are mutually exclusive. You cannot be charged with 'assault' and 'attempted murder' from the same crime as the intent of each is different. Likewise, 'assault with a deadly weapon' and 'assaulting an officer' are also crimes that exclude others. Pay careful attention to the requirements of each law and select the one that best fits the crime when deciding sentence.

	If the crime has a victim involved who chooses '''not''' to press charges ''specific to them'', security may '''not''' decide to press charges anyway. It doesn't matter why. If someone punches someone else, security can still arrest the assailant, but if the victim decides they would rather talk it out instead of them getting jail time, then security should let them do it. Arresting them anyway falls under wrongful arrest. Note, the victim must '''choose''' this option. A murder victim cannot voice their choice and therefore cannot choose to drop charges. <sub>(Note that not all killings are murder - see '''Victim In A Willfully Dangerous Position''', below, if the victim is resleeved and ~~testifies that it was willing, or the accused~~ testifies that it was willing and there is no evidence to the contrary)</sub>		If the crime has a victim involved who chooses '''not''' to press charges ''specific to them'', security may '''not''' decide to press charges anyway. It doesn't matter why. If someone punches someone else, security can still arrest the assailant, but if the victim decides they would rather talk it out instead of them getting jail time, then security should let them do it. Arresting them anyway falls under wrongful arrest. Note, the victim must '''choose''' this option. A murder victim cannot voice their choice and therefore cannot choose to drop charges. <sub>(Note that not all killings are murder - see '''Victim In A Willfully Dangerous Position''', below, if the victim is resleeved and testifies that it was willing and there is no evidence to the contrary)</sub>

	This does not mean a victim can excuse '''all''' crimes committed by the assailant, only the crimes committed '''directly''' against them. Security can still charge the assailant for crimes that, while may have happened at the same time as crimes committed against the victim, did not directly involve the victim. This includes crimes against other people and to property belonging to the base/station/etc. The victim cannot speak on behalf of these entities.		This does not mean a victim can excuse '''all''' crimes committed by the assailant, only the crimes committed '''directly''' against them. Security can still charge the assailant for crimes that, while may have happened at the same time as crimes committed against the victim, did not directly involve the victim. This includes crimes against other people and to property belonging to the base/station/etc. The victim cannot speak on behalf of these entities.

Izac112: /* Medium Level Infractions */

2020-02-10T21:27:49Z

Medium Level Infractions

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 10 February 2020
Line 367:		Line 367:
	\| To escape from confinement as someone who was serving a non-life sentence or was awaiting judgement.		\| To escape from confinement as someone who was serving a non-life sentence or was awaiting judgement.
	\| See "Escaping From a Life Sentence" for those who do it with life sentences.		\| See "Escaping From a Life Sentence" for those who do it with life sentences.
	\| 20 minutes on top of the original sentence being reset. If this pushes it over 90 minutes, ~~hold~~ until ~~judgement~~.		\| 20 minutes on top of the original sentence being reset. If this pushes it over 90 minutes, Hold until transfer.
	\| Up to 30 minutes. Demotion.		\| Up to 30 minutes. Demotion.
	\|-		\|-

Izac112: /* Modifiers & Special Situations / its suppose to be hut not huj*

2020-01-30T13:04:50Z

Modifiers & Special Situations: *its suppose to be hut not huj*

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 30 January 2020
Line 580:		Line 580:
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Repeat Offenders'''		\|'''Repeat Offenders'''
	\| Some people just don't get it and immediately start causing problems again when released. This only applies for repeat offenses of ''the same offense''. This way, even if the person is just doing something minor that's only worth a 2 minute sentence, then that 2 minutes becomes 4, then the next time 4 becomes 8, then 8 becomes 16, and so on until you pass 90 minutes, at which point they are automatically held until ~~judgement~~. Note that if they make an unrelated offense, it doesn't count toward this. You can't double a sentence for stealing because the same individual was caught vandalizing earlier. That's not how repeat offenses work. That's a different offense entirely.		\| Some people just don't get it and immediately start causing problems again when released. This only applies for repeat offenses of ''the same offense''. This way, even if the person is just doing something minor that's only worth a 2 minute sentence, then that 2 minutes becomes 4, then the next time 4 becomes 8, then 8 becomes 16, and so on until you pass 90 minutes, at which point they are automatically held until transfer. Note that if they make an unrelated offense, it doesn't count toward this. You can't double a sentence for stealing because the same individual was caught vandalizing earlier. That's not how repeat offenses work. That's a different offense entirely.
	\| For the first repeat of an offense, apply the "additional penalties" excluding execution/demotion, which must be authorized by the relevant head(s) of staff. For repeat offenses beyond that, multiply the prior sentence by 2. Ergo, 10 minutes becomes 20, then 20 becomes 40, and so on until more 90 minutes or more is accumulated. At that point, it's automatically ~~HuJ~~.		\| For the first repeat of an offense, apply the "additional penalties" excluding execution/demotion, which must be authorized by the relevant head(s) of staff. For repeat offenses beyond that, multiply the prior sentence by 2. Ergo, 10 minutes becomes 20, then 20 becomes 40, and so on until more 90 minutes or more is accumulated. At that point, it's automatically HuT.
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Self Defense'''		\|'''Self Defense'''

Shadow Quill: Small typo

2020-01-27T19:19:12Z

Small typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 27 January 2020
Line 581:		Line 581:
	\|'''Repeat Offenders'''		\|'''Repeat Offenders'''
	\| Some people just don't get it and immediately start causing problems again when released. This only applies for repeat offenses of ''the same offense''. This way, even if the person is just doing something minor that's only worth a 2 minute sentence, then that 2 minutes becomes 4, then the next time 4 becomes 8, then 8 becomes 16, and so on until you pass 90 minutes, at which point they are automatically held until judgement. Note that if they make an unrelated offense, it doesn't count toward this. You can't double a sentence for stealing because the same individual was caught vandalizing earlier. That's not how repeat offenses work. That's a different offense entirely.		\| Some people just don't get it and immediately start causing problems again when released. This only applies for repeat offenses of ''the same offense''. This way, even if the person is just doing something minor that's only worth a 2 minute sentence, then that 2 minutes becomes 4, then the next time 4 becomes 8, then 8 becomes 16, and so on until you pass 90 minutes, at which point they are automatically held until judgement. Note that if they make an unrelated offense, it doesn't count toward this. You can't double a sentence for stealing because the same individual was caught vandalizing earlier. That's not how repeat offenses work. That's a different offense entirely.
	\| For the first repeat of an offense, apply the "additional penalties" excluding execution/demotion, which must be authorized by the relevant head(s) of staff. For repeat offenses beyond that, multiply the prior sentence by 2. Ergo, 10 minutes becomes 20, then 20 becomes 40, and so on until more 90 minutes or more is accumulated. At that point, it's automatically ~~HuT~~.		\| For the first repeat of an offense, apply the "additional penalties" excluding execution/demotion, which must be authorized by the relevant head(s) of staff. For repeat offenses beyond that, multiply the prior sentence by 2. Ergo, 10 minutes becomes 20, then 20 becomes 40, and so on until more 90 minutes or more is accumulated. At that point, it's automatically HuJ.
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Self Defense'''		\|'''Self Defense'''

Izac112: Adds Smoking in a prohibited area'

2020-01-21T18:57:46Z

Adds Smoking in a prohibited area'

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 21 January 2020
Line 286:		Line 286:
	\| '''Resisting Arrest (§202)''' added to charges. Dismissal.		\| '''Resisting Arrest (§202)''' added to charges. Dismissal.
	\| N/A		\| N/A
			\|-
			\| §127
			\| '''Smoking in a prohibited area'''
			\| Smoking in non-smoking area, or anywhere else where open flames shouldn't be present.
			\| Currently, the only area designated as non-smoking is the Medical Bay. '''This includes the lobby,''' but if someone is brought into, or enters, the medical bay for an injury while smoking, they should probably be warned rather than charged with this. Additionally, areas where unstable gasses or fuel are stored are also non-smoking.
			If someone is injured because of it (e.g. from fires caused by a lit cigarette), see '''Negligence (§206)'''
			\| 2 minutes
			\| Up to 5 minutes. Demotion or Dismissal.
			\| 150 credits.
	\|}		\|}

Shadow Quill: added to moderated pages

2020-01-20T23:12:29Z

added to moderated pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 21 January 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Reference}}

	[[Corporate Regulations]] is the name for the current regulations in effect on the station at any given time. It also provides common and uncommon offenses and suggested punishments for them.		[[Corporate Regulations]] is the name for the current regulations in effect on the station at any given time. It also provides common and uncommon offenses and suggested punishments for them.

Izac112: /* Low Level Infractions */

2019-10-15T17:40:22Z

Low Level Infractions

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 15 October 2019
Line 268:		Line 268:
	\| Up to 10 minutes. Demotion.		\| Up to 10 minutes. Demotion.
	\| 100 credits if a warning had already been issued.		\| 100 credits if a warning had already been issued.
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\| §125		\| §125
Line 277:		Line 276:
	\| Up to 10 minutes. Demotion.		\| Up to 10 minutes. Demotion.
	\| 200 credits. Immediate search.		\| 200 credits. Immediate search.
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\| §126		\| §126